Saturday, June 23, 2007

Reply to UCI-Chancellor's Message on British Boycott

On June 15th, the Chancellor of UCI, Michael Drake, published a message regarding the recent boycott of the apartheid state by the British University and College Union (UCU).

Instead of honoring the brave stance that the UCU is taking against a country that openly practices apartheid; he voiced his contempt against their actions.

Chancellor's Message on British Boycott

Below is a response from a UCI Alumnus.

Dear Chancellor Drake,

I am writing in response to your message published June 15th 2007 strongly opposing the recent vote by the British University and College Union (UCU) to propose an academic boycott of Israel. In my opinion, your message was one-sided and misleading.

First, your statement accusing the UCU of attempting to "shun an entire community of scholars based on what appears to be political opposition to the policies of the incumbent government" is a distortion of the truth.

The boycott movement against Israel , including UCU's recent proposal, is not based on a political position, rather it is based purely on moral and ethical grounds.

Contrary to your above quoted statement, the boycott movement is not a reaction to the policies of a particular government, past or incumbent. Rather, the boycott campaign is targeted at those who support and justify an illegal occupation, one which has been going on for decades and which violates international law and universal principles of human rights. This is stated clearly in the Palestinian Civil Society's (PCS) call for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) in June 2005, which initiated the recent world-wide campaign of non-violent resistance against illegal Israeli policies and practices.

Furthermore, the academic boycott is not directed at the entire community of Israeli academics, as you mention. The academic boycott is aimed only at those institutions which openly support and justify Israel's illegal occupation and inhumane policies. In its call on June 2005, the PCS extended its hand to Israelis and invited conscientious Israelis to support them, "for the sake of justice and genuine peace".

Second, I do agree that an intellectual and open discussion is essential to arrive at a better understanding of any situation, particularly one that is as charged as the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. However, to establish a meaningful dialogue, there needs to be a minimum level of understanding between all parties; a common grounds or reference to which all parties agree. In the case of the Palestinian/Israeli issue, no meaningful or effective dialogue can occur without all parties agreeing to stand against any group or government (Israeli or Palestinian) which violates international law and universal principles of human rights.

We may differ on how effective an academic boycott may be in terms of ending injustice and supporting the oppressed. However, one who views the current academic boycott movement in support of the basic human rights of Palestinians as oppressive to Israeli scholars clearly does not have a good understanding of the reasons behind the movement or the goals it aims to achieve.


Huda Shaka`
UCI alumni


Zeyad said...

Jazzak Allahu kheyran for your constant efforts and activism. I am a student at UCI and I feel like Chancellor Drake is alienating a large chunk of students against injustice, I mean students against Israel.

Insha'ALLAH this is not the last he will hear about his unfair stance in support of oppression. Insha'ALLAH you will be rewarded on the Day of Judgment.

Anonymous said...

Nah you guys are just a small minority of sick folks who love suicide bombing and crap like that. Thanks for ruining the rep of the university. I went to a job interview and somehow they were more interested in why I chose to go to a campus that promotes terrorism. In fact, they were appalled.

Ya'll need to learn to separate you personal sick views from the University and to stop making all of us look bad cuz a few of you are nuts.

Anonymous said...

How can i wipe windows xp from my laptop and reinstall windows Me -the laptops original software?
I procure recently bought a acquainted with laptop that is old. The mortal physically I had bought it from had installed windows xp on it, orderly for all that it from the word go came with windows Me. I after to remove the windows xp because it runs slows on the laptop because it takes up more memory than the windows Me would. Also I need to remove windows xp because it is an proscribed copy. So when I tried to ass updates on it, windows would not introduce updates because the windows xp is not genuine. [URL=]analisis semiotico de sitios web[/URL]

Answers :

It's best to relinquish [URL=]model ramjet plans[/URL] Windows XP and good upgrade your laptop. It's much better. [URL=]allure trafficmaster vinyl plank flooring[/URL] In addition to, Windows XP is style [URL=]cella frigorifero[/URL] heartier then Windows Me. Windows Me is obsolete and many programs that can come across with XP, can't [URL=]left hand semi auto shotgun[/URL] vamoose with Me.
all you participate in to do is interject the windows me disk into the cd drive. then reboot your laptop, when the coal-black [URL=]celtic head hunders[/URL] shield with all the info comes up and when it asks u to boot from cd [URL=]1993 mazda mx-5 miata shop manual[/URL] chance any indication when it tells you to then inaugurate from there !!! I RECOMEND SINCE ITS AN ILLEAGLE TEXT TO WIPE [URL=]edmonton welding school[/URL] MANIFEST THE [URL=]terri watson pta[/URL] THOROUGH HARD PUSH WHEN IT ASKS YOU WHICH UNDENIABLE [URL=]anup sidhu psychiatrist[/URL] PROD TO POSITION IT ON. THEN SUM UP ALL THE UNENCUMBERED PAUSE ON THE EMPTY [URL=]nalco colloidal silica[/URL] REALISTIC DRIVE ONTO A DIFFERENT COLUMN FINGERS ON, IT WILL LOOK LIKE C:/ Exposed or something like that